Markets Reprice AI Risk as PCE Looms and Geopolitics Tests Commodities
U.S. markets were closed Monday for Presidents Day, but the “risk-off” tone did not take the day off. By the time European trading wrapped, investors were still leaning defensive as the tech-led selloff broadened and the market’s newest obsession shifted from “AI winners” to…

U.S. markets were closed Monday for Presidents Day, but the “risk-off” tone did not take the day off. By the time European trading wrapped, investors were still leaning defensive as the tech-led selloff broadened and the market’s newest obsession shifted from “AI winners” to “AI disruption.”
That shift matters because it changes what investors punish. It is no longer just expensive multiples. It is the fear that AI adoption compresses margins for incumbents, or forces a new wave of spending that takes longer to pay back than the market wants to tolerate. The Nasdaq’s multi-week slide has become a symbol of that narrative, with commentary increasingly framing the move as a sentiment break rather than a tidy pullback.
Commodities reflected the same tension. Oil hovered around the high-$60s as traders watched U.S.-Iran talks in Geneva for clues about whether the geopolitical risk premium should shrink or snap back. Gold pulled back sharply as the dollar firmed and some safe-haven demand cooled. Industrial metals softened into the Lunar New Year lull, with thin liquidity amplifying moves while inventories stayed uncomfortably high.
All of this sets up a deceptively important end-of-week catalyst: Friday’s Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation release, the Fed’s preferred gauge, which could either validate the market’s mid-year cut narrative or force a quick repricing.
Stock of Interest Today: DoorDash (DASH)
DoorDash reports fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results after the close on Wednesday, February 18, with a conference call scheduled that evening. That timing is notable because investors have become far less forgiving of companies that combine high expectations with heavy spending, especially in anything AI-adjacent.
On the fundamentals, DoorDash remains the scale leader in U.S. restaurant delivery. Independent estimates vary, but most point to DoorDash controlling roughly two-thirds of U.S. meal delivery, with Uber Eats as the other major national player. Scale is not just about order volume. It can lower delivery times, improve selection density, and support higher-margin layers like ads and sponsored placement.
That higher-margin layer is increasingly central to the thesis. DoorDash has said its ads business has reached an annual run rate above $1 billion, with a large and growing base of advertisers. If advertising continues to scale, it helps answer the market’s core question: can delivery platforms expand profitability without relying solely on higher fees or relentless cost cutting.
International growth is the other lever. DoorDash completed its acquisition of Deliveroo in October 2025, a deal it positioned as a major step toward expanding outside the U.S. Some deal coverage characterized the transaction as meaningfully increasing DoorDash’s non-U.S. footprint.
The pushback, and it is real, is about spending and valuation. DoorDash has already warned that it plans to step up investments, which has previously spooked investors even when revenue growth held up. And depending on which earnings definition you use, the stock can still screen expensive on forward multiples compared with other high-growth consumer internet names.
So this earnings print is not just about beats and misses. It is about whether DoorDash can show that (1) ads are compounding, (2) international expansion is translating into durable growth, and (3) incremental investment is producing visible operating leverage, not just bigger ambitions.
Current price: $159.94
Analyst target: $180
Five Market Themes Worth Watching
The market is trading like it wants confirmation. Confirmation that the AI-driven spending cycle will produce returns, not just capex. Confirmation that geopolitics will not reprice energy overnight. Confirmation that inflation is cooling enough to justify mid-year rate cuts. The next few sessions are likely to be defined by whether those confirmations arrive, or whether risk premia get rebuilt.
Tech Selloff and the Nasdaq’s Multi-Week Slump
The headline is the Nasdaq’s extended run of weekly losses, which has become a psychological marker for investors rotating away from crowded growth exposures. Under the surface, the story is broader: “AI disruption” fears have been bleeding from software into adjacent sectors that depend on pricing power, labor leverage, or predictable demand, including transportation and parts of commercial real estate.
What makes this different from a normal growth pullback is the “why.” Reuters has described a renewed skepticism that heavy AI spending will generate returns quickly enough to justify prior valuations. Until the market gets clearer proof, either through earnings or hard evidence of monetization, rallies risk being treated as exits rather than fresh entries.
What to watch: management commentary on AI-related budgets, payback timelines, and whether revenue acceleration is keeping pace with spending. If that gap keeps widening, the market tends to punish “promise” stocks first.
U.S.-Iran Talks and the Oil Risk Premium
Brent has been trading around $68 as investors watch indirect U.S.-Iran negotiations in Geneva. The key market mechanism is simple: progress in talks can compress the geopolitical premium, while a breakdown can reprice supply risk quickly.
There is also an embedded tail risk around the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reporting has noted Iranian naval activity near the strait in the run-up to talks, a reminder that energy markets can move on posture as much as policy.
What to watch: any language around enforcement, sanctions, and shipping security. Oil does not need a full resolution to move, it just needs probabilities to shift.
Industrial Metals Softness Into the Lunar New Year Lull
Copper dipped below $12,800 a ton in thin holiday trading, with rising exchange stockpiles weighing on sentiment as many Asian desks went quiet for Lunar New Year. Thin liquidity matters because it can exaggerate moves, but the deeper issue is inventory. Reuters has highlighted that combined copper stocks across major exchanges have surged to the highest levels since 2003, undercutting the idea that physical scarcity is the near-term driver.
When inventories climb while prices stay elevated, markets start treating rallies as positioning-driven rather than demand-driven. That makes industrial metals more sensitive to incremental headlines, like tariff chatter, Chinese restart timing after the holiday, and shifts in warehouse flows.
What to watch: post-holiday Chinese physical demand signals, LME inventory trends, and whether backwardation gives way to contango, which typically implies looser near-term supply.
Gold Pullback as the Dollar Firms and Risk Premiums Shift
Gold slid to a one-week low as the dollar strengthened and some safe-haven demand cooled, with traders also watching Geneva talks for signs that geopolitical risk might ease. Gold can fall even in cautious markets if the dollar rises, because it tightens financial conditions and mechanically makes bullion pricier for non-dollar buyers.
The more important takeaway is not the single-day move, it is what gold is “agreeing” with. If diplomacy reduces the fear bid while markets still believe rate cuts are coming later this year, gold can enter a consolidation phase rather than a straight-line trend.
What to watch: the dollar’s direction, real yields, and whether rate-cut expectations stay intact after Friday’s inflation data.
PCE Inflation and Fed Positioning
The Bureau of Economic Analysis has its next PCE release scheduled for Friday, February 20. That report matters because it directly influences how quickly the Fed can justify easing, and markets have become increasingly sensitive to any “sticky inflation” surprise.
After the recent soft inflation print, Reuters reported that rate futures priced roughly 64 basis points of easing over 2026, with June cut odds rising meaningfully. If PCE runs hotter than expected, that pricing can unwind fast. If it runs cooler, risk assets may get a relief rally, at least temporarily.
What to watch: core PCE, not just the headline, and any signs that services inflation is cooling in a sustained way rather than in one-off dips.
Bottom Line
Markets are acting like they are in a referendum phase. Big Tech has to prove AI spending creates near-term returns, not just bigger balance sheets. Commodities are being pulled between diplomacy and inventories, with oil tied to Geneva headlines and metals weighed down by stockpile reality. And the week’s most important macro input is Friday’s PCE release, which will either reinforce the mid-year cut story or force investors to reprice risk all over again.
Sources:
- https://www.barrons.com/livecoverage/stock-market-news-today-021726/card/stock-futures-drop-as-tech-selloff-gathers-pace-5PsLZGwQt2tprkvF53Ln
- https://ir.doordash.com/news/news-details/2026/DoorDash-to-Announce-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2025-Financial-Results-on-February-18-2026/default.aspx
- https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/us-stock-futures-slip-persistent-ai-disruption-fears-2026-02-17/
- https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-steady-traders-weigh-supply-risks-heading-into-key-us-iran-talks-2026-02-17/
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-17/industrial-metals-decline-in-thin-lunar-new-year-holiday-trading
- https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/gold-falls-1-firmer-dollar-thin-asia-trade-2026-02-17/
- https://www.bea.gov/data/personal-consumption-expenditures-price-index
- https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/global-markets-marketcap-2026-02-16/
Market Munchies and Mode Mobile communications are for informational purposes only, and are not a recommendation, solicitation, or research report relating to any investment strategy, security, or digital asset. All investments involve risk including the loss of principal and past performance does not guarantee future results.
Any information contained in this commentary does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. There is no guarantee that any statements or opinions provided herein will prove to be correct.